Friday 31 March 2017

Presentation 2017 - Paper 13 - The New Literature

Hello friends,
Here I am sharing my today’s presentation which I prepared as a part of my academic internal assessment.


PAPER 13- THE NEW LITERATURE
TOPIC – “Questioning Faith and Religion with reference to “The Da Vinci Code”, “Khuda Kay Liye” and “PK”.



Friday 17 March 2017

Assignment - Paper no.(15) Mass Media Studies - "Renaissance in Gujarati Cinema"

Name: Hariyani Vaidehi C.

Roll no- 18

Year - 2015-17

M.A Semester - 4

Paper no.(15) Mass Media Studies

Email Id: - vaidehi09hariyani@gmail.com

Unit - 3 Cinema
Assignment topic:
 Renaissance in Gujarati Cinema


Submitted to:
Smt.S.B.Gardi
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH,
MAHARAJA KRISHNAKUMARSINHJI  BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY,


Cinema plays a vital role in society. From young to old, from rich to poor, from rural to urban all the people love to watch movies. Cinema take us to places which may be we can never visit and inside the life of people somewhat different from ourselves. They offer us a space to see the wider world, lengthening our viewpoint and opening our eyes to new surprises.


The cinema of India has had a deep effect on Cinema across the world since the early 20th Century. It contains of films created in India, which includes the filmmaking cultures of different states like Marathi, Hindi, Assam, Gujarat and many.

In this assignment we will try to see the journey of Gujarati Cinema in detail.
The Gujarati Cinema (Dhollywood) has produced more than thousands of films from its beginning. The journey of this cinema started 84 years ago. 
Let’s have a look at the beginning of this Cinema.

Beginning:-

The film industry of Gujarat began in 1932. The first Gujarati Movie “Narsinh Mehta” was directed by Nanubhai Vakil. The film was matchless. Then came “Sati Savitri” based on the epic story of Savitri and Stayavan which was followed by “Ghar Jamai” by Homi Master.
Gujarati films thus proceeded with several other important social, political as well as religious issues. The years 1948, 1950, 1968, 1971 moved in a wide variety of dimensions. The Gujarati Movies such as “Kariyavar” by Chaturbhuj Doshi, “Vadilono Vank” by Ramchandra Thakur, “Gadano Bel” by Ratibhai Punatar and “Leeludi Dharti” brought immense success to industry. The problems of modernisation were the underlying concern of several films. Movies like “Gandano Bel” had strong realism and reformism.  “Bhavni Bhavai” (1980), directed by Ketan Mehta, was produced by NFDC, the Sanchar Film Cooperative Society, and a district bank in Ahmedabad. Though the film was not a folk theatre form of Bhavai, it incorporated several elements of it.

As it is said that,
“Good time flies away quickly”

With the immense amount of success, Gujarati Cinema also had a period of decline.

Decline:-
The Gujarat Film Development Corporation (GFDC) established to promotion Gujarati films was closed in 1998. The quality of the films deteriorated due to the focus on improving the financial investments and profits as well as not acclimatizing to changing times, technology and demographics. Low budget films with bargained quality targeted rural audiences while urban audiences motivated to television and Bollywood films with quality content as they had a reasonable understanding of the Hindi language.
People started enjoying the Hindi films more over Gujarati films. It was a tough time for the Gujarati Cinema to survive.

Renaissance in Dhollywood:-


“If something good fades away, something better is on the way.”
There was an increase in the number of film productions after 2005 due to the tax exemption and the rise in demand for films in rural North Gujarat. The demand was fired by the working class population. The number of films produced per year was over sixty in 2009 and 2010. The number of films produced reached seventy-two in 2012, the most in the history of Gujarati cinema.

Time goes on and the things have changed now. Gujarati cinema has changed peoples’ attitude. People get fascinated by the enhancement of the Gujarati cinema in the film industry. Even the youngsters of Gujarat started watching Gujarati films.

Especially the rise of Gujarati Cinema after the films like “Bey Yaar” and “Better Half” is worth noting.

“Kevi Rite Jaish” (2012) and “Bey Yaar” (2014), both directed by Abhishek Jain, became commercially and critically successful drawing an urban audience.

“Kevi Rite Jaish” is a satire on the fascination and obsession of the Patels' - a Gujarati farmer community - immigration to the U.S. Over the last half century, thousands of Patels have travelled to the U.S.A and have come to control its motel industry.

“Bey Yaar” was the most celebrated film in whole film industry. 
Jay Vasavada called it, "Brilliant, Brave, Bright"

The film was screened at New York Indian Film Festival on 5 May 2015 and became the first ever Gujarati film to do so. This film almost broke the record of Gujarati Cinema.

“The Good Road” (2013), directed by Gyan Correa, earned the Best Gujarati film at the 60th National Film Awards and later became the first Gujarati film ever selected to represent India at the Oscars. The success of these urban films drew new actors, directors and producers to the Gujarati film industry which had been stunted for a long time. Digital technology and social media helped the film industry by expanding its reach. “Gujjubhai The Great” and “Chhello Divas” were commercially successful films of 2015. The box office collection of Gujarati films increased a lot.

“Chhello Divas” is a comedy Gujarati film written and directed by Krishnadev Yagnik. The film revolves around the lives of eight friends in the last year of college. This film was immensely popular among the young crowd. People watched this film over and over again.

“Carry On Kesar” is an Indian Gujarati social comedy film directed by Vipul Mehta. It is a socially relevant film that talks of a traditional elderly childless couple deciding to have a baby. Shyamji and Kesar Patel, a traditional Gujarati elderly childless couple live in a small town in Gujarat. A fashion designer based in Paris, Annie comes across Kesar’s artistic work and makes arrangement to learn the art from her. However, things don't go as planned and a twist of fate prompts Kesar to confront her past. The couple decides to have a child at an age where most couples are grandparents.
This film brings in the reality of our society. In Gujarat people are not that open to things like this. Such movie tries to bring some changes in the society.

The scripts and stories of the Gujarati films include relationship and family oriented subjects, as well as human aspirations and Indian family culture. There were a large number of films based on mythological narratives and folklore produced in the early years of Gujarti cinema. The life of popular saints and satis of Gujarat were made into films such as Narsinh Mehta and Gangasati. They were targeted at rural audiences familiar with the subjects. There were social films associated with family life and marriage such as Gunsundari and Kariyavar. Several Gujarati films were adapted from Gujarati novels such as Kashi no Dikro. There was spurt again in the 1970s for saint/sati films. In the early 2000s, films were targeted chiefly at rural audiences demanding local narratives with local linguistic style. Following 2005, urban subjects were introduced leading to a revival of Gujarati cinema. In recent times, films which are more relevant to audiences are being produced.

“Meghdhanushya” (2013) was the first Gujarati film focused on the LGBT community.Meghdhanushya” (2013) is the first movie to positively feature the gay community in Indian Gujarati cinema. It is directed by Dr K R Devmani and produced by Mahendra Bhai Patel, with narration by Manvendra Singh Gohil and Sylvester Merchant.
This film portrays how lesbians and gay men have a part in society, and shows their situations and conditions they experience. Not only the films but the quality of music is also increased much with the time.

Conclusion:-
Renaissance means revival or rebirth. We can see that this is renaissance period going on for Gujarati Cinema in India as well as worldwide. The new generation is going at the epoch of success. We hope that the dark ages never return in this field.

Reference:-
  • Wikipedia contributors. "Cinema." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 10 Dec. 2016. Web. 16 Mar. 2017.
  • Wikipedia contributors. "Cinema." Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 10 Dec. 2016. Web. 16 Mar. 2017.
  • Class Notes

Assignment - Paper no.(14) The African literature

Name: Hariyani Vaidehi C.

Roll no- 18

Year - 2015-17

M.A Semester - 4

Paper no.(14) The African literature

Email Id: - vaidehi09hariyani@gmail.com


Assignment topic:
 Can the subaltern speak? But are they even heard?


Submitted to:
Smt.S.B.Gardi
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH,
MAHARAJA KRISHNAKUMARSINHJI  BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY,



Can the subaltern talk? is a well-known exposition by Gayatri Chakraborty Spivak.


Gayatri Chakraborty Spivak is an Indian researcher, scholar, and feminist. She is University Professor at Columbia University, where she is an establishing individual from Institute for Comparative Literature and Society. Considered "a standout amongst the most persuasive postcolonial scholarly people", Spivak is best known for her exposition "Can the Subaltern Speak?" and for her interpretation of and prologue to Jacques Derrida's De la grammatologie.

In "Can the Subaltern Speak?" Spivak examines the absence of a record of the Sati work on, driving her to ponder whether the subaltern can even talk. Spivak relates how Sati shows up in local chronicles. Spivak shows that the Western foundation has darkened subaltern encounters by accepting the straightforwardness of its grant. Spivak explains on the procedure, the attention on the Eurocentric Subject as they reject the issue of portrayal; and by illusion the Subject of Europe, these learned people constitute the subaltern Other of Europe as unknown and quiet.

Gayatri Spivak moreover specifies the second rate position of third world women, and she utilizes the expression "subaltern" to depict them. She ponders on basically colonized females who are twofold colonized economy and sexual orientation. Furthermore, she makes it clear that there are not two fundamental orders of individuals and countries as colonizer and colonized, yet there is another gathering aside from this, and it is the ladies mistreated by both the colonizer and colonized.  
The harassment of imperialism and patriarchy makes it terrible for the females, thus non-white ladies were quieted and no one can hear them.

Here we are going to analyse the women characters in the African Literature. We know that the colonizers mistreated the male as well as the female natives. Here we will see that the colonized man also treated the women in a bad way along with the colonizers. In recent years we see that the condition of women is improving, but are they really heard?

“Mumbi” – in Ngugi wa Thiango’s “A grain of Wheat”:-
Mumbi is a blameless spectator in all of the misbehaviours. She is sister of Kihika. One might think that being a sister of an activist; she must hold a high place in society. But she is exploited. She becomes a mere victim in this struggle. Kihika is not able to save her sister Mumbi from this exploitation.
Mumbi is raped by Karanja, a British collaborator when her husband Ginkoyo is imprisoned in the British Concentration Camp. Mumbi is left without any identity and she is almost used as a thing for the male; colonised as well as colonizers.  Of course his brother or the male members of that place didn’t try to save her or even support her.  Thus, we can see that she was mistreated by all the colonizers used her and the colonized couldn’t protect her.

The role of women in Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart:-
Okonkwo is a well-known wrestler of the Ibo community. He is a man of courage and strength, but what is the courage in mistreating his wife.  The Ibo allowed wife beating. The novel describes two instances when Okonkwo beats his second wife, once when she did not come home to make his meal. He beats her severely. He beat her again when she referred to him as one of those "guns that never shot”.
So we can observe that he has more than one wife. That may be the culture but is the position of women praiseworthy in that society. On one hand the colonizers ruled over them by torture and hard work, on the other hand their own male family members beat them. There is no place for them to complain and to speak. Even if they speak the main question is that are they heard or not?

Desala in “The Swamp Dwellers”:-
Desala symbolises the modern life. She is seen by all the family members as an unfaithful woman. We can’t blame Desala because as a young girl when she married to Igwezu she also must be having some young dreams for her life and when she tried to fulfil all her dreams she is also not wrong. The society doesn’t give her that position of good women. Here we see the role of her own people not considering her as a good person.

The archetypal mindset is same everywhere. When countries like Africa, India etc. were colonized by the colonizers at that time we saw that how the females must be treated. Women were always kept in inferior position by the Patriarchal society. Whether the men are colonizers or colonised or of any position, they keep the women always in periphery.

For example:-
In the play “Hamlet”, we see Ophelia in subaltern position. She is just treated as a thing by her father and Hamlet too. We don’t find her raising voice. Even she raises her voice who was going to listen to her in that patriarchal mindset society.

Another example we can see of Hester Prynne. She was not guilty yet the patriarchal society troubled her a lot.
This was about literature. Now let’s see the real examples of the recent time.

In 21st century we say that the position of women is changing. They are coming in the centre but now of they are coming in the centre then they should be heard.

Are they heard???????

No

The situation is still the same.

With the help of technology we can see now there are many tools available were girls can also share their views. Twitter, Facebook and many social media platforms gives women a chance to post something. There are many ways but are women heard on this platform also. In the past women were getting some kind of punishment of speaking or they were completely ignored. In this time women are trolled if they speak something. There are many examples about this act of trolling. Let’s analyse some of them.


Actress Shruti Seth was trolled on Twitter for making comments on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s selfie with daughter plan.
She twitted,
“A selfie is not a device to bring about change Mr. PM Try reform. #selfieobsessedPM “
— Shruti Seth (@SethShruti) June 28, 2015
This was her opinion. It is not necessary that all the women like this idea of Selfie. So what is wrong if someone doesn’t agree with others? Especially when a woman speaks something it becomes problematic.

Let’s view another example:-

Zaira Wasim, the young actress from 'Dangal' was also being trolled on the social networking site Twitter. She was forced to apologise publicly after her pictures with Mehbooba Mufti went viral on social media, and the Jammu & Kashmir chief minister described her as a "Kashmiri role model".

The 16-year-old from Srinagar, who was  trolled on Twitter, made two Facebook posts explaining her position. Trolls laid into her and the J&K CM for being "Indian agents".

Spivak in Can the Subaltern Speak talks about how people(Here we can say women) oppressed by colonizers(Present time – The Patriarchal society are not allowed a voice because they do not have importance to be heard.  Women act out in acts of violence to make a point, and no one understands or does anything to change the way the subaltern is being treated today.

Conclusion –

Kyu sach ka sabak sikhaaye
Jab sach sunn bhi naa paaye
Sach koi bole tto tu niyam kanoon bataye
Tera darr, Tera pyaar, teri wah
Tu hi rakh rakh saala
Sadda Haq Aithe Rakh


All the women can speak but they also should be heard. Other males should protest against this type of treatment given by any male to women. All the women have right to speak what they want. Well we don’t know whether anything will change in future or not.
Reference:-
CLICK HERE to evaluate my assignment

Tuesday 14 March 2017

Assignment Paper 13 - The New Literature

Name: Hariyani Vaidehi C.

Roll no- 18

Year - 2015-17

M.A Semester - 4

Paper no.(13) The New Literature

Email Id: - vaidehi09hariyani@gmail.com


UNIT : - 4

Assignment topic:
 Objectification of Female Characters in Movie Adaption of Literary Texts.


Submitted to:
Smt.S.B.Gardi
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH,
MAHARAJA KRISHNAKUMARSINHJI  BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY,
 BHAVNAGAR, GUJARAT.



Introduction:-
Women are always seen as an object or things. In this 21st century there are many advertisements, songs, serials and movies where women are objectified. They are used as mere things to sell something. Since the starting of advertising many spans ago, women have been objectified, and in some instances, insulted or degraded. Well still the same pattern of objectification and the mindless use of semi-naked women continue in different popular media. 
Here in this assignment we will see that how women are objectified in the film adaptation of literary text. With the help of examples we will see the topic in detail.

                      “Objectification of Female characters”

Film adaptation of literary text is now a new trend growing worldwide. In India also we find many directors also in this business. Here we are going to talk about the Hollywood film adaptations of literary text.
There is a wide difference between portrayal female characters in literature and movies. The objectification comes into picture when the director gives a visual image to the female character.

We can come to a question here that,
Do all the film objectifies women characters in a similar way? What difference can we see in the portrayal of 'Ophelia' (Kate Winslet) in Kenneth Branagh's ‘Hamlet’, 'Elizabeth' ( Helena Bonham Carter) in Kenneth Branagh's Mary Shelley's Frankenstein or ' Hester Prynne' (Demi Moore) in Roland JoffĂ©'s The Scarlet Letter' or David Yates's 'Hermione Granger' (Emma Watson) in last four Harry Potter films - and 'Sophie Neveu' (Audrey Tautau) in Ron Howard's The Da Vinci Code?

Let’s try to find out this answer…

Kenneth Branagh’s ‘Hamlet’ is famous literary film adaptation of William Shakespeare’s play ‘Hamlet’.

When we read the character of Ophelia in the play we don’t read her as an object. Of course feminist reading of the text do say that she was the only one who is been cheated by the male characters of the play, but the film tries to materialise her character. Ophelia many times is show nude which is not that needed. Women are in love with someone but love should not necessarily connect with nudity. Love is something to feel not to objectify.



Also we can question that why only women or Ophelia is portrayed that way???

While reading the play we can see that Hamlet is in love with Ophelia, but the film is showing sexual relations which was not that much needed. After all it is a revenge play, then why Ophelia is objectified so much without any reason.

The same portrayal of the character can be observed in'Elizabeth' ( Helena Bonham Carter) in Kenneth Branagh's Mary Shelley's Frankenstein or ' Hester Prynne' (Demi Moore) in Roland JoffĂ©'s The Scarlet Letter' . Hester Prynne and Elizabeth are also showed nude in the movie. Hester Prynne in the book is portrayed in a good way. She is the one who becomes ‘Angel’ in the book, but here the angel is used to gain more audience or profit. Hester is physically described in the first scaffold scene as a tall young woman with a "figure of perfect elegance on a large scale." Her most impressive feature is her "dark and abundant hair, so glossy that it threw off the sunshine with a gleam”. The girls shouldn’t be shown nude to show the beauty.

The argument is that female figure is used as product. Women are exploited in a way.



David Yates's 'Hermione Granger' (Emma Watson) in last four Harry Potter films , her portrayal is also a bit problematic in a way. Of course she is the heroine of 21st century and has given much space.  She is portrayed as very intellectual girl. She is strong and powerful. Right from the first she is one of the best witches of the year. Coming from the muggle family, she enters the school with all the knowledge of wizardry. Like Sophie Neveu, she accompanies Ron and Harry in all the adventures in the book and movie as well.
Alas! In the movie she is used as an object of rivalry between Harry and Ron. She could challenge both the male characters. She had that capacity, but instead she is been used as an object to make friends fight. Her portrayal is not as problematic as of Ophelia, Hester or Elizabeth, but there is a slight touch of objectification. This type of objectification is not presented anywhere in the text or play. Writer could have used something else for rivalry between two friends. If we compare Hermione with Ophelia (Hamlet) or Hester Prynne (The Scarlet Letter) then definitely Hermione is far better female character.

Sophie’s character in Ron Howard’s “The Da Vinci code” is very clever and gorgeous. The main theme of the novel is FEMININE SACREDNESS. This theme is also captured in the film quite beautifully. We never see camera moving on the female body to make movie more sensual. Sophie has been portrayed as smart girl who is curious to solve the puzzle. Here feminine sacredness is shown when Robert Langdon kisses Sophie on her forehead. Kiss on the forehead represents the respect and care one has for any women.

All the female characters are beautiful and their description is also presented well in the book, but not in the movies.

In Dan Brown’s ‘The Da Vinci Code’, Sophie is described like this:-

“Langdon turned to see a young woman approaching. She was moving down the corridor toward them with long, fluid strides…a haunting certainty to her gait. Dressed casually in a knee-length, cream-colored Irish sweater over black leggings, she was attractive and looked to be about thirty. Her thick burgundy hair fell unstyled to her shoulders, framing the warmth of her face. Unlike the waifish, cookie-cutter blondes that adorned Harvard dorm room walls, this woman were healthy with an unembellished beauty and genuineness that radiated a striking personal confidence.”

Ron Howard captures this simplicity of beauty while portraying Sophie.

Even in the Bollywood film adaptations like ‘Haider’ is not far behind in the objectification of women. Bollywood also objectifies women.
For example: - The item songs in Bollywood.
These songs are just to increase TRP or profit of the film

If we compare Ophelia with Hermione or Sophie Neuve, then there is a vast difference. 21st century female characters are getting more space. Female characters have grown a lot.  They are equal or smarter than male characters. Sophie and Hermione both accompanies to male members in the journey. But in novel, the depiction is different in the movies.

Conclusion:-


All the movie makers or directors should understand that Women have their own identity. They are not any objects used to increase their wealth or popularity. Recently in the Bollywood movie “Badrinath ki Dulhania” a satire is made on how women or girls are taken as liability in India. Not only in India but everywhere we can see this. The Archetypal Patriarchal mindset is same everywhere in the world.

O, Patriarchy!
How long, how far will you go on to objectify female?
To condition woman as perpetual 'giver',
You gendered Earth and Nature as Mother Earth and Mother Nature.
You named farmer as the father of the world.
And thus eternal exploitation of the 'body'.
To condition woman as entertaining tool,
You gendered Language as Mother Language.
And more feminine names to Other languages.
Why is it that you do not call Father Earth or Father Language?

Works Cited

  • Barad, Dilip. Blogger. 17 January 2014. 11 March 2017 <http://dilipbarad.blogspot.in/2014/01/worksheet-screening-movie-da-vinci-code.html>.
  • Barad, Dilip. Facebook.com. 14 March 2015. 11 March 2017 <https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10153168497412472&set=a.401829287471.180440.533772471&type=3&theater>.
  • Dave, Nimesh. Blogger. 4 March 2016. 11 March 2017 <http://nimeshdave22.blogspot.in/2016/03/the-da-vinci-code-by-dan-brown.html>.